The European Commission is threatened with a lawsuit over the greenness of gas and nuclear energy

The European Commission is threatened with a lawsuit over the greenness of gas and nuclear energy shutterstock
Katerina Belousova

For the proposal to be passed, it must be supported by a majority of the assembly's 705 lawmakers

MEPs threaten the European Commission with a lawsuit if its plan to include gas and nuclear energy in the green taxonomy becomes law.

This was said by MEP Paul Tang, the European Parliament's lead negotiator on green bond laws and part of its negotiating group on taxonomy, reports Reuters.

Next week (July 4-8), the European Parliament will decide whether to accept or reject the Commission's proposal to classify gas and nuclear power plants as climate-friendly on the list of sustainable investments.

"Parliament will definitely try to go to court. We will argue that this is against primary legislation, and we will definitely fight for it," Tang said.

A proposal for a parliamentary vote would see the plan rejected on the grounds that it does not comply with current EU law, which requires an investment to significantly contribute to one of six environmental goals and not harm others. Tang noted that the vote will be tight.

For the proposal to pass, it must be supported by a majority of the 705 lawmakers in the assembly.

The European Commission declined to comment.

Sirpa Pietikäinen, one of parliament's leading taxonomy negotiators, said she would support legal action if parliament did not block the rules.

"If it comes to that, I will support a lawsuit and part of a group of MEPs who will take it to court," Pitikainen said.

Opponents of nuclear power, namely Austria and Luxembourg, have also threatened legal action against Brussels over the proposals.

"Through the Sustainable Investment Label, the EU aimed to set a single standard for green finance and direct private capital to investments that support climate change goals," explained Reuters.

However, the plan has divided EU countries and lawmakers, reflecting wider disagreements over how Europe should cut its emissions. The invasion of russia (the main supplier of gas to Europe) into Ukraine intensified the discussion.

Some countries, notably Poland and Bulgaria, have lobbied for a taxonomy to encourage gas investment to phase out coal. Others, such as Denmark and Luxembourg, argued that the proposal to call fossil fuels green was not credible.

We will remind activists demand a veto on the green taxonomy, to stop russian lobbyists.

As previously reported by EcoPolitic, the European Commission introduced gas and nuclear projects to the green list.

Related
Temperatures are rising, but global warming doesn't exist? NASA has caused outrage with its report
Temperatures are rising, but global warming doesn't exist? NASA has caused outrage with its report

The US continues to ignore climate change. The censored report is entirely consistent with this controversial trend

Sponsors destroying winter: athletes criticize the 2026 Winter Olympics
Sponsors destroying winter: athletes criticize the 2026 Winter Olympics

The cumulative anti-climatic effect of the competition will cause snow to melt over an area equivalent to 3,000 Olympic hockey rinks

2025 was the third hottest year in recorded history – Copernicus
2025 was the third hottest year in recorded history – Copernicus

At this rate, the world will exceed the 1.5 °C mark ten years earlier than scientists had predicted

"It doesn't affect me." Prejudices about climate change prevent us from stopping it
"It doesn't affect me." Prejudices about climate change prevent us from stopping it

65% of people do not assess the risks of global warming objectively, believing that abstract "others" will suffer more