Greenpeace staged a protest against Russian gas in the Baltic Sea and advocated for a “green” course greenpeace.org/ukraine

Greenpeace staged a protest against Russian gas in the Baltic Sea and advocated for a “green” course

Illya Fedun

In 2024, Europe paid Russia 22 billion euros for gas

Polish Greenpeace activists dived into the Nord Stream gas pipeline, which runs along the bottom of the Baltic Sea, to protest against its restoration.

According to the press service of Greenpeace Ukraine, they demanded to accelerate the development of renewable energy sources so that Europe could become independent of Russian gas.

The protesters dived into the Baltic Sea at the spot where the gas pipeline was blown up almost three years ago. They also unfurled a banner on the surface of the water with the words: “No to Nord Stream, no to fossil gas.”

The activists also emphasize climate security, as the extraction and transportation of gas causes large emissions of methane. Even one ton of methane is 80 times more harmful to the environment in the short term than the same amount of carbon dioxide.

“The export of fossil fuels finances the Russian war... Ideas about restoring the Nord Stream gas pipeline are unacceptable! We must close this discussion once and for all and make it impossible to return to Nord Stream,” said Natalia Gozak, director of Greenpeace Ukraine and participant in the action.

According to her, despite the Russian-Ukrainian war, European countries continue to buy Russian gas in large volumes. By doing so, they are financing the aggressor country, as last year alone, EU countries paid Russia €22 billion for resources, which is 15% of Russia's annual military budget.

Greenpeace Ukraine noted that a complete ban on imports of fossil fuels from Russia is not expected to take effect in the EU until 2027. Therefore, Europe should focus on renewable energy sources right now, as their absence poses a threat to Europe. Europe may face an energy crisis, and the war in Ukraine will continue due to the constant flow of money from Europe to Russia.

Earlier, EcoPolitic wrote that the EU had doubled its target for the development of renewable energy sources by 2030 (42.5%) after Russia stopped supplies through Nord Stream.

Related
War and decarbonization: how might CBAM affect Ukraine’s economy?
War and decarbonization: how might CBAM affect Ukraine’s economy?

CBAM may create additional pressure on Ukrainian businesses

In 2024, Metinvest spent $170 million on environmental modernization
In 2024, Metinvest spent $170 million on environmental modernization

Last year, the manufacturer identified environmental issues as one of its priorities

Decarbonization Fund: how many and which projects were financed in the first half of this year
Decarbonization Fund: how many and which projects were financed in the first half of this year

The total amount of loans granted is about UAH 275 million, which is not even close to the funds allocated for decarbonization of the EU industry

EBA analyzed the challenges and ways to solve them in establishing Ukraine's NDC2
EBA analyzed the challenges and ways to solve them in establishing Ukraine's NDC2

According to experts, as of today, modelling does not provide even a rough idea of greenhouse gas emission scenarios in the post-war period