US can join the greening of global trade and implement its CBAM

US can join the greening of global trade and implement its CBAM
Katerina Belousova

Local steel and cement producers need protection in the decarbonization process

US efforts to decarbonize metallurgy may be undermined if the country does not introduce a cross-border tax on carbon emissions.

This was stated by the General Director of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) Kevin Dempsey, adding that the <br should prevent the import of cheaper steel with a high carbon content, reports GMK Center with reference to S&P Global.

Dempsey emphasized that the investments of US metallurgists in decarbonization amount to $23 billion. And the cross-border carbon adjustment mechanism will become an important factor for the decarbonization of the industry.

Holcim's head of climate, environmental, social and governance policy and government affairs, Melissa Carey, said steel and cement producers needed protection in the decarbonisation process. After all, such modernization leads to higher costs.

The material emphasized that the supporters of the cross-border levy also believe that the USA should introduce its counterpart CBAM. After all, the first stage of the launch of the carbon tax in the EU will begin in October 2023. The CBAM will cover six sectors, including steel imports.

"Decarbonization of the industrial sector turned out to be a difficult area for legislators. Several bipartisan packages approved over the past couple of years have made it possible to attract billions in funding for process replacement demonstration projects," the article said.

It is noted that the US Department of Energy is currently accepting final proposals for projects aimed at accelerating decarbonization in energy-intensive industrial sectors. After all, the production of steel, aluminum and cement accounts for almost 25% of greenhouse gas emissions in the country.

Earlier, EcoPolitic wrote, that Great Britain is considering introducing its carbon tax on imported steel, which is similar to the European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).

As EcoPolitic previously reported, on April 18, the members of the European Parliament approved agreements on the reform of the emissions trading system (ETS), the carbon import adjustment mechanism (CBAM) and the creation of the social climate fund (SCF). In June, the European Commission published the draft "Regulations on the implementation of CBAM" regarding obligations regarding CBAM reporting and rules.

Related
Revolutionary changes in the EU: governments want to make it compulsory to reinvest 75% of ETS revenues in decarbonisation
Revolutionary changes in the EU: governments want to make it compulsory to reinvest 75% of ETS revenues in decarbonisation

The rationale behind this proposal is to support the eco-modernisation of enterprises, which generate revenue for the system and bear the brunt of the fiscal pressure

Almost half a billion: the Decarbonisation Fund’s summer performance review
Almost half a billion: the Decarbonisation Fund’s summer performance review

The fund has also received funding from UNIDO for industrial decarbonisation. It is not known exactly which projects the funds will be spent on

The business community has called for further refinement of the draft legislation on the Ukrainian quota market
The business community has called for further refinement of the draft legislation on the Ukrainian quota market

According to the business community, a separate fund should be established to manage the revenues from the NETS, and the priority for the use of these funds should be the decarbonisation of industry

The Decarbonisation Fund has already allocated 2.2 billion hryvnia to low-carbon projects
The Decarbonisation Fund has already allocated 2.2 billion hryvnia to low-carbon projects

Their combined climate impact is an annual reduction in CO₂ emissions of 47,000 tonnes