Scientists name the richest countries in the world that promote deforestation outside their borders shutterstock

Scientists name the richest countries in the world that promote deforestation outside their borders

Hanna Velyka

They emphasized the need to develop a policy that would take into account the loss of biodiversity outside the territories of the states

24 economically developed countries have caused significantly greater losses of plant and animal species outside their borders than inside them.

This is stated in a study published in the scientific journal Nature.

Its authors concluded that the world's richest countries together have caused 15 times more biodiversity loss at the international level than at the national level, stimulating deforestation to meet demand for agricultural and forestry products.

The study maps global biodiversity loss hotspots, showing that rich countries often affect species in nearby regions, but can also put pressure on distant ecosystems. In particular, this happens because the expansion of crops for export outpaces the expansion of crops consumed domestically, so international trade plays an important role in deforestation.

Where the hot spots were found

18 of the 24 countries studied had a greater impact abroad than domestically. Scientists say that the United States, Japan, China, Germany and France have made the greatest contribution to global biodiversity loss.

nature.com

Source: nature.com.

For example, Germany's international impact on biodiversity is concentrated in West Africa, while France has been identified as a driving force behind biodiversity loss in Madagascar. Meanwhile, biodiversity loss associated with the United States is most pronounced in Central America.

The study shows that a country's influence on species loss decreases with geographic distance, meaning that biodiversity loss tends to be concentrated in neighboring tropical countries.

There are exceptions, however, where economically developed countries have a significant impact on biodiversity in remote regions, such as Madagascar, where deforestation for vanilla production plays an important role.

The scientists emphasized the need to develop policies that would take into account biodiversity losses beyond national borders.

What the EU is doing

The EU accounts for about 10% of global deforestation, mainly due to imports of palm oil (34%) and soybeans (32.8%), followed by timber, cocoa, coffee, rubber and corn.

To address this problem, the EU has introduced rules to curb deforestation related to its market. The new EU Forestry Strategy 2030 aims to improve the quality and quantity of forests, while enhancing their role as carbon sinks.

In April 2023, the European Parliament approved rules requiring companies to ensure that products sold in the EU do not contribute to deforestation or forest degradation.

They were originally due to come into force in December 2024, but their implementation was postponed for a year: large companies must comply by December 2025, and small businesses by June 2026.

The new law covers key products such as palm oil, soy, cocoa, coffee, livestock, wood, beef, leather, paper, furniture, cosmetics, and chocolate. Companies must also verify compliance with human rights standards and protect the rights of indigenous peoples.

In early December 2024, the European Parliament and the Council agreed to postpone the implementation of the EU Deforestation Regulation. EcoPolitics also recently reported that in 2022 and 2023, during the full-scale invasion, Ukraine lost forest cover over an area of more than 1579 km².

Tags: ,
Related
European Commission says EU lags behind on plans to achieve zero pollution
European Commission says EU lags behind on plans to achieve zero pollution

The countries of the bloc aim to reduce anthropogenic pollution to a level safe for human health and the environment by 2050

The list of EU surface water pollutants has been updated with new substances
The list of EU surface water pollutants has been updated with new substances

This is the fourth update of the list, which was first compiled in 2015

The EU expects Ukraine to implement environmental reforms in 2025
The EU expects Ukraine to implement environmental reforms in 2025

The European Commission once again reminded of the urgency of reforming the environmental control system

The EU assessed its progress in achieving environmental goals: they did not like the results
The EU assessed its progress in achieving environmental goals: they did not like the results

In particular, a complete failure was recorded in the reuse of materials and an increase in greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture and forestry