Eurofer has criticized the European Parliament's intention to change the emissions trading system

Eurofer has criticized the European Parliament's intention to change the emissions trading system shutterstock
Olena Yatseno

Changes in the emissions trading system will "derail" green steel production, the association is confident

The European Steel Association Eurofer has written an open letter to the European Parliament and member states on changes to the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), which the association believes will "disrupt" the transition to green steel production in Europe.

This was reported by the publication with reference to a letter from Eurofer to the European Parliament Steel Times International.

The letter says European lawmakers are currently considering proposals for the EU's ETS and the Carbon Border Regulation (CBAM), which "undermine EUROFER's ability to invest in these projects and slow down the transition to green steel production in Europe".

The association stressed that in Europe, the new allocation rules would reduce the basic CO2 benchmark by about 40% - through a single plant that was not previously covered - and set a value that no company could achieve in just three years. This is due to the premature transition from a free distribution system and indirect reimbursement to a CBAM system that has not yet been tested. Bypassing and shuffling resources are just some of the many risks that can undermine the effectiveness of CBAM.

"These proposals weaken our industry's protection against carbon leakage in domestic and global markets, favoring international competitors that are not subject to equivalent carbon costs," the letter said.

Moreover, CBAM does not yet envisage any measures to save 20 million tons of steel exports from the EU worth 45 billion euros a year and 30,000 jobs that directly depend on it, the association added.

With this in mind, Eurofer called on the European Parliament and the Council to avoid "further reducing existing carbon leakage protection until CBAM proves its effectiveness and a solution is found for exports".

"Low-carbon technologies should be rewarded without a premature reduction in benchmarks, at least in the first years when such technologies are implemented on an industrial scale," they added.

Before EcoPolitics reported that The Committee on the Environment has voted in the European Parliament for the Border Carbon Regulatory Mechanism (CBAM) and the reform of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which are tools to achieve the EU's climate targets under the Fit for 55 package.

Related
Environmental results: what made 2025 memorable
Environmental results: what made 2025 memorable

The main focus in both Ukraine and the EU has been on finding a balance between the economy and the environment, while the main challenge for global climate policy has been the radical change in the US position

The CBAM baseline figures for 2026 turned out to be higher than expected
The CBAM baseline figures for 2026 turned out to be higher than expected

The EU encourages exporters to use verified data

The EU plans to expand the scope of CBAM: which industries will be affected
The EU plans to expand the scope of CBAM: which industries will be affected

Officials want to eliminate loopholes that could allow foreign manufacturers to avoid climate costs

The Ministry of Economy's immediate plans for the environmental sector: what industrialists and environmentalists should prepare for
The Ministry of Economy's immediate plans for the environmental sector: what industrialists and environmentalists should prepare for

In this case, as in the previous specialized agency, it was also decided to "ignore" systemic corruption in the forestry sector