Separate bottle collection without the State Tax Service: why it doesn’t work in the EU and won’t work in Ukraine

Separate bottle collection without the State Tax Service: why it doesn’t work in the EU and won’t work in Ukraine shutterstock
Maria Semenova

Lawmakers are themselves creating a discrepancy with European standards that will hinder the achievement of European recycling targets

By January 1, 2037, the rate of separate collection of plastic bottles and metal cans in Ukraine is expected to reach 90%. This requirement is included in the working draft of the bill "On Packaging and Packaging Waste." And only from that same date is the deposit-return system (DRS) for collecting these types of packaging supposed to go into effect. There is a fundamental contradiction here, because without the DRS, achieving a 90% collection rate is practically impossible, as the experience of EU countries demonstrates.

The public association Zero Waste Alliance Ukraine drew attention to this contradiction and explained how it works in the European Union and how it should work in Ukraine.

European targets

By 2029, the EU must separately collect 90% of plastic bottles. This target was set by the European Commission. EU packaging regulations require the same targets from EU member states. To achieve this, countries must introduce deposit-return systems. An exception applies if, by 2026, they increase the volume of separate collection of plastic bottles and metal containers to 80% and submit a plan to reach 90%.

From personal motivation to cleaner recyclables

The implementation of a deposit-return system creates a key factor in citizen engagement: financial motivation. By returning a bottle or can, a person immediately feels the personal benefit of this eco-friendly action.

At the same time, the deposit-return system establishes a convenient network for returning packaging in retail and collects cleaner raw materials for recycling. In other words, only through the deposit-return system can more containers be collected in a less contaminated state. The European Commission wrote about this in its analysis, citing data from Zero Waste.

Countries that failed without a DRS

Some countries attempted to reach the pan-European target without implementing a deposit return system. According to Zero Waste, Spain is an example. The country already had an effective community waste collection system and a developed Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) program, believing this would suffice.

However, in 2023, Spain separately collected only 41.3% of beverage bottles. This extremely low rate rekindled the public debate on DRS, so now the government is rolling out a DRS nationwide.

"This is a very telling lesson for Ukraine: even a strong container collection system without a deposit mechanism cannot achieve 90% separate collection," emphasizes Zero Waste.

DRS can deliver rapid results

A notable example of DRS effectiveness is Latvia. The system there started only on February 1, 2022. Within just two years, the return rate for packaging reached 80%. At the same time, the DRS operator reported an increase in PET bottle collection from 45% to 83%.

An artificial gap in the legislation

Ukraine must align its domestic legislation with European Union law – a requirement of the integration process. Waste management is no exception. Therefore, if the EU enforces regulations on separate collection and DRS implementation by 2029, Ukraine should not postpone them until 2037.

"Including 2037 in the law as the mandatory DRS launch means from the very beginning creating a gap with the same EU act that Ukraine itself ties this draft law to," the organization stressed.

EcoPolitic previously reported on the changes proposed by lawmakers in the draft working version of the packaging law.

Related
One year on from the abolition of the Ministry of the Environment: an assessment of promises, results, decisions and failures
One year on from the abolition of the Ministry of the Environment: an assessment of promises, results, decisions and failures

We’re checking whether the ‘mega-ministry’ experiment has stood the test of reality

The government has officially split the Ministry of Economy, Environment and Agriculture
The government has officially split the Ministry of Economy, Environment and Agriculture

Environmental policy remains under the remit of the Ministry of Economy

A draft bill on the taxonomy of sustainable activities has been presented in Ukraine
A draft bill on the taxonomy of sustainable activities has been presented in Ukraine

The document sets out the sustainability criteria, environmental objectives and technical criteria required to assess a business’s operations

Large companies in the EU have been banned from destroying unsold clothing and footwear
Large companies in the EU have been banned from destroying unsold clothing and footwear

Every year, up to 600,000 tonnes of textiles are destroyed even without being used