France banned "forever chemicals" but made an exception due to lobbying by Tefal

France banned "forever chemicals" but made an exception due to lobbying by Tefal AP Photo

Maria Semenova

Europe is only working on a plan to phase out PFAS, and the French government's actions should have set a positive precedent

France has banned perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), better known as "forever chemicals." This landmark decision was welcomed by the country's population, reflecting the general sentiment in the EU regarding the harmfulness of these substances.

The law is not as strong as it could have been. According to Euronews, environmentalists believe that it has been weakened by amendments and exceptions.

Why are "forever chemicals" cause for concern?

The PFAS group includes nearly 10,000 synthetic substances that take thousands of years to decompose naturally. Humankind has been using them since the 1940s. During this time, the chemicals have managed to penetrate everywhere, even into the bodies of deep-sea ocean animals.

The impact on living organisms is extremely negative. There is a link between PFAS and the development of cancer and autoimmune diseases, as well as infertility.

Bans and monitoring

The ban applies to the sale, production, and import of all PFAS products for which there is a safe alternative. The law covers clothing, cosmetics, and even ski wax.

The law also requires French authorities to test drinking water for polyfluoroalkyl substances. Polluters face fines.

The situation with water pollution by "forever chemicals" is indeed tense. These substances are currently found in drinking water in European communities with a population of 12.5 million people.

The anti-environmental lobby of French business

There are exceptions. In particular, the law does not restrict the circulation of high-performance filtration membranes and textiles, which have been identified as important for national sovereignty or essential use.

The ban also bypassed cookware with non-stick coatings. It is noteworthy that they were included in the first draft of the law, but disappeared from it due to active lobbying by the French company Tefal.

The company maintains that since 2012 it has stopped using PFAS and switched to cookware with PTFE coatings. Even this alternative is not entirely safe-as during cooking, these substances may release microplastic particles.

Stricter restrictions are needed

“The not-so-good news is that some essential items, such as kitchenware, were excluded. Now France needs to strongly support the pan-European restriction on PFAS to include more products and protect citizens across all member states,” said Sandra Bell from CHEM Trust.

The European Union still lacks a unified regulatory act banning “forever chemicals.” Officials state that a phase-out plan is being developed. This has been ongoing for several years. When the document will be presented remains unknown.

Earlier, EcoPolitic reported on a study that detected PFAS in the bodies of dolphins and whales.

Tags: ,
Related
What to expect from the EU ETS review: from bonus allowances to limits on emissions reductions
What to expect from the EU ETS review: from bonus allowances to limits on emissions reductions

As early as 2027, 400 million additional free emission allowances could be released onto the market

Eco-labelling helps the EU build a circular economy
Eco-labelling helps the EU build a circular economy

Researchers have established a direct link between the prevalence of eco-labelling and the use of recycled materials

The relaxation of the EU ETS, demands from industry, and forest fires: a round-up of EU economic news
The relaxation of the EU ETS, demands from industry, and forest fires: a round-up of EU economic news

The heatwave is already forcing investors to rethink their approach to risk management, yet the industry still wants to pay less for emissions

The EU Chemicals Alliance is effectively controlled by corporations that manipulate the environmental agenda — report
The EU Chemicals Alliance is effectively controlled by corporations that manipulate the environmental agenda — report

Experts refer to this as corporate occupation, whilst environmental organisations have virtually no influence on decision-making