The UAH 15.7 million allocated for environmental protection measures will be spent on the creation of a new institution

The UAH 15.7 million allocated for environmental protection measures will be spent on the creation of a new institution shutterstock
Hanna Velyka

Real actions or yet another unrealizable plan – officials choose the latter

The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has redirected UAH 15.7 million from the environmental protection program to finance the newly created Institute for Ecological Restoration and Development of Ukraine.

The announcement of such a reallocation of budget funds allocated to the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine for 2025 was made on the Telegram channel of the government's representative in the Verkhovna Rada, Taras Melnychuk.

The government has withdrawn funds from the program “Implementation of Environmental Protection Measures, in particular to Improve the Environment” and added them to the program “Scientific and Scientific and Technical Activities in the Field of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources”.

Now, UAH 15.7 million, which could be used to finance the implementation of more than one environmental project, will be spent to “ensure the establishment and operation in 2025 of the newly created state scientific institution, the Institute for Ecological Restoration and Development of Ukraine.” This institution will be subordinated to the Ministry of Environment. And every year it will “bite off” a piece of the already modest environmental budget.

At every international event, the Ministry's top officials emphasize how diligently they care about the environment even during the war. But in fact, it turns out that environmental protection measures are not currently a priority at all. Because even the funds that could be spent on real projects with visible and tangible results, the Ministry of Environment prefers to spend them on writing another pile of useless papers with super-ambitious plans that will never come to fruition.

A month ago, EcoPolitic analyzed the expenditures of the Ukrainian Decarbonization Fund and found that there is a substitution of concepts when selecting projects for preferential lending. As a result, industrial enterprises, which are the main payers of the eco-tax, cannot get the funding they need to decarbonize their production.

We also wrote that, according to expert Liudmyla Tsyhanok, businesses are losing millions because of the environmental impact assessment procedure, and it needs to be rebooted.

Related
Quietly and under the cover of war: the government may cancel environmental impact assessments for logging
Quietly and under the cover of war: the government may cancel environmental impact assessments for logging

The EIA curbs the appetites of foresters and enables the public to monitor whether trees really need to be cut down

New requirements for return water as a trap: the government has set businesses an impossible task
New requirements for return water as a trap: the government has set businesses an impossible task

Experts urge businesses to demand clear protocols and methodologies that can truly assess water quality

The government has extended the ban on timber exports until the end of 2026
The government has extended the ban on timber exports until the end of 2026

This is an effort to support Ukrainian production and reduce pressure on the environment

Failures and achievements in Ukrainian environmental policy in 2025
Failures and achievements in Ukrainian environmental policy in 2025

A series of decisions by Ukrainian officials runs counter to European environmental priorities