The UAH 15.7 million allocated for environmental protection measures will be spent on the creation of a new institution

The UAH 15.7 million allocated for environmental protection measures will be spent on the creation of a new institution shutterstock
Hanna Velyka

Real actions or yet another unrealizable plan – officials choose the latter

The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has redirected UAH 15.7 million from the environmental protection program to finance the newly created Institute for Ecological Restoration and Development of Ukraine.

The announcement of such a reallocation of budget funds allocated to the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine for 2025 was made on the Telegram channel of the government's representative in the Verkhovna Rada, Taras Melnychuk.

The government has withdrawn funds from the program “Implementation of Environmental Protection Measures, in particular to Improve the Environment” and added them to the program “Scientific and Scientific and Technical Activities in the Field of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources”.

Now, UAH 15.7 million, which could be used to finance the implementation of more than one environmental project, will be spent to “ensure the establishment and operation in 2025 of the newly created state scientific institution, the Institute for Ecological Restoration and Development of Ukraine.” This institution will be subordinated to the Ministry of Environment. And every year it will “bite off” a piece of the already modest environmental budget.

At every international event, the Ministry's top officials emphasize how diligently they care about the environment even during the war. But in fact, it turns out that environmental protection measures are not currently a priority at all. Because even the funds that could be spent on real projects with visible and tangible results, the Ministry of Environment prefers to spend them on writing another pile of useless papers with super-ambitious plans that will never come to fruition.

A month ago, EcoPolitic analyzed the expenditures of the Ukrainian Decarbonization Fund and found that there is a substitution of concepts when selecting projects for preferential lending. As a result, industrial enterprises, which are the main payers of the eco-tax, cannot get the funding they need to decarbonize their production.

We also wrote that, according to expert Liudmyla Tsyhanok, businesses are losing millions because of the environmental impact assessment procedure, and it needs to be rebooted.

Related
The "greenest" and most vague environmental programs: how Kirovohrad Oblast spends its environmental tax revenue
The "greenest" and most vague environmental programs: how Kirovohrad Oblast spends its environmental tax revenue

This is the most vague list of measures, though it still makes clear how the environmental tax is being spent on sewer systems and landscaping in residential areas

In the Carpathians, a forest containing valuable plant species is being cleared to build a power line to a wind farm
In the Carpathians, a forest containing valuable plant species is being cleared to build a power line to a wind farm

Unlike environmental activists, foresters did not notice any endangered plants there

The environmental impact of eco-friendly tableware: why this alternative isn't always ideal
The environmental impact of eco-friendly tableware: why this alternative isn't always ideal

Substances that aren't particularly healthy — and even plastic itself — are sometimes used to coat eco-friendly tableware

Court seizes part of "Protasov Ravine" due to loopholes in Kyiv City Council Decision – activists
Court seizes part of "Protasov Ravine" due to loopholes in Kyiv City Council Decision – activists

The capital's authorities failed to ensure the timely return of the land to the community, which gave the owner leverage in defending their rights