The environmental impact of eco-friendly tableware: why this alternative isn't always ideal

The environmental impact of eco-friendly tableware: why this alternative isn't always ideal
Maria Semenova

Substances that aren't particularly healthy — and even plastic itself — are sometimes used to coat eco-friendly tableware

Disposable plastic tableware has become a common part of people’s lives. Picnics, food courts, food delivery—it all seems so convenient, since there’s nothing to wash. However, the harm it causes to the environment and people far outweighs its perceived convenience. As a result, the market offers a range of more eco-friendly alternatives. But are they all truly eco-friendly?

EcoPolitic decided to discuss the main types of eco-tableware and the risks associated with them.

What is eco-tableware?

This is a fairly general term for a wide range of disposable plates, cups, and cutlery that are supposedly less harmful to the environment. It is better than plastic because it decomposes faster or is recyclable.

Among eco-tableware, the following types can be distinguished:

  • Biodegradable. This type is made from organic materials that, under composting conditions, are capable of decomposing within a few months. Such tableware can be made from corn starch, bamboo, or even palm leaves.
  • Wooden. This mostly refers to cutlery such as forks, chopsticks, or spoons;
  • Paper and cardboard.

Is eco-friendly tableware really safer?

In reality, this depends on many factors that the manufacturer may not disclose.

For example, to prevent biodegradable tableware from falling apart when exposed to moisture, special substances may be used in its production. Sometimes, an ultra-thin plastic layer may be applied to paper plates.

Even composting is not always straightforward. Sometimes, in order for such tableware to truly decompose, it needs to be pretreated. In a landfill, it may remain intact for years.

An important nuance regarding recycling: during sorting, the “biodegradable” nature of the tableware may go unnoticed, so instead of recycling, it ends up in the landfill.

What are the alternatives?

Despite all its downsides, eco-friendly tableware still causes less harm to the environment than plastic. The small amount of environmentally hazardous substances that may be used will have fewer negative consequences.

However, the best alternative is always reusable tableware, which does not end up in the trash after its first and only use. Taking such a set of dishes with you outdoors or asking a barista to pour your coffee into your own travel mug can become a useful everyday habit.

EcoPolitic previously reported that single-use plastic products are planned to be allocated to a new group for customs accounting at the border.

Plastic pollution is increasing worldwide. If the use of plastic is not restricted, by 2040 its quantity will double. As of 2025, 130 million t of plastic were entering the environment annually.

Tags: ,
Related
More than 100,000 Black Sea dolphins may have died as a result of the war — says a scientist
More than 100,000 Black Sea dolphins may have died as a result of the war — says a scientist

Animals are being poisoned by petroleum products, whilst explosions are causing disorientation and concussions

8,000 hectares of woodland have been planted in southern Ukraine over the past three years: how the climate is affecting this
8,000 hectares of woodland have been planted in southern Ukraine over the past three years: how the climate is affecting this

To establish forests in southern Ukraine, it is necessary to carefully select tree species and tend to the young plantations for years on end

The world has failed to meet virtually all its 2030 nature conservation targets — UN
The world has failed to meet virtually all its 2030 nature conservation targets — UN

Only efforts to minimise the impact of climate change on biodiversity were highly rated

Sand was stolen from the state for three years: the traffickers caused damage to the environment amounting to over 48 million UAH
Sand was stolen from the state for three years: the traffickers caused damage to the environment amounting to over 48 million UAH

Those involved in the scheme laundered illegally extracted minerals through companies under their control