Communities in the Kharkiv region are refusing to allow environmentalists to establish protected areas

Communities in the Kharkiv region are refusing to allow environmentalists to establish protected areas shutterstock
Maria Semenova

The Regional State Administration even went so far as to break the law by failing to provide either comments or approval of the applications

Only 2.3% of the Kharkiv region’s area has protected status. This figure is one of the lowest in Ukraine. However, this does not mean that there are no valuable ecosystems in the region. In 2025 alone, conservationists from the UNCG prepared documentation to establish six landscape reserves, but received no support from the authorities or local communities.

This was reported by the Ukrainian Nature Conservation Group (UNCG).

Refusal to protect

The organisation proposed providing protection for areas covering over 10,000 hectares. These included steppe and forest ecosystems, meadows and floodplains. These lands are part of Europe’s Emerald Network.

However, environmental experts in the Kharkiv region showed no desire to protect nature. The UNCG received a series of refusals, as well as comments from land users and owners. Moreover, according to the organisation, there were even breaches of Ukrainian legislation.

“We witnessed a direct violation of the Law of Ukraine ‘On the Nature Reserve Fund of Ukraine’, since the Kharkiv Regional State Administration did not provide comments or approve any of our submitted petitions. Its officials spent the entire year sending formal replies and forwarding documents,”the organisation stated.

Objective Reasons or Excuses?

The most popular reason given for refusal to create the reserves was concern that it might impose additional restrictions for residents or the agricultural sector. The latter seems particularly out of place, since only municipal lands were proposed for conservation.

At the same time, UNCG insistsestablishing a reserve does not restrict traditional land uses, but only prohibits activities that may harm nature.

The second most common argument was martial law. Environmental experts say this reason is used by authorities who should be developing the region’s network of protected sites.

Overall, in Kharkiv region the designation of protected territories has virtually stalled since after 2010. In many cases, the expansion of nature reserves was zero.

“While nature in Kharkiv region suffers from the consequences of war, it needs more, not less protection. We will continue to work on the creation of these territories and will re-apply to the authorities. Because preserving valuable nature cannot wait for ‘better times’,”emphasised the UNCG.

EcoPolitic previously reported that the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine approved the creation of the national nature park “Chornyi Lis”the first such site in Kirovohrad region.

Related
Wind turbines are being installed on the Runa mountain pasture in the Carpathians, despite promises from the Ministry of Economy — activists
Wind turbines are being installed on the Runa mountain pasture in the Carpathians, despite promises from the Ministry of Economy — activists

The destruction of high-altitude meadows continues, and some of the sites where rare plants used to grow have already been destroyed

This week’s round-up of environmental crimes: tree felling, environmental pollution and theft of mineral resources
This week’s round-up of environmental crimes: tree felling, environmental pollution and theft of mineral resources

Separately, prosecutors are attempting to return land belonging to the water, forestry and nature reserve funds to the state

The fire has engulfed thousands of hectares of the occupied nature reserve
The fire has engulfed thousands of hectares of the occupied nature reserve

Fires have destroyed areas of virgin steppe containing rare plants

Weekly round-up of environmental crimes: billions in losses from mineral resources, forests and pollution
Weekly round-up of environmental crimes: billions in losses from mineral resources, forests and pollution

In two instances, business owners felled thousands of trees on leased land without permission