Business representatives urged not to resume scheduled inspections of subsoil users for the time being

Business representatives urged not to resume scheduled inspections of subsoil users for the time being pexels
Hanna Velyka

They warned against excessive pressure on enterprises under martial law

Members of the European Business Association (EBA) have called for the rejection of the draft resolution on the resumption of scheduled inspections of subsoil users.

The corresponding appeal to officials is posted on the EBA website.

The EBA reported that on February 26, 2025, the State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine published a draft resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, which proposes to amend Government Resolution No. 303 of March 13, 2022. In particular, the document provides for the resumption of scheduled and unscheduled inspections of subsoil users whose activities are of a high risk.

Why this project was developed

After analyzing the published document, EBA experts concluded that its main purpose is to identify and prevent the formation of so-called “dormant permits”. They noted that there could potentially be only 29 of them, but more than 300 companies would be subject to inspections.

Why the EBA considers its adoption irrational

The EBA experts reminded of two important circumstances:

  • the current legislation already provides for the possibility of unscheduled inspections in case of a threat to the rights of citizens, the environment, or the security of the state;
  • in accordance with the Subsoil Code of Ukraine, the grounds for termination of a special permit are failure to take measures to eliminate violations after they are detected during the control.

Based on this, the problem of “dormant permits” can be solved without massive inspections of all subsoil users, experts believe.

“Under martial law, a significant part of the industry operates in extremely difficult conditions due to security risks, staff shortages, disruption of logistics chains and energy supply,” the EBA reminded.

Therefore, the EBA members warned that the introduction of large-scale inspections affecting hundreds of companies would create additional administrative and financial pressure, which in turn could lead to a halt in production processes.

With this in mind, EBA members asked to reject this draft resolution.

In January, business representatives insisted on additional work on draft law No. 12188 “On Mining Waste,” and the Committee on Environmental Policy and Nature Management agreed to their proposal to extend the deadline for submitting and processing proposals to this draft law to 3 weeks.

EcoPolitic also informed that the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine proposes to cancel the permit for special use of natural resources for minerals.

Related
Saving the Zhikhor Forest from quarry expansion: a nature reserve project was presented in Kharkiv
Saving the Zhikhor Forest from quarry expansion: a nature reserve project was presented in Kharkiv

No government representatives attended the event, but the activists hope to get their message across to them at the forthcoming round-table discussion

There are plans to require large businesses to disclose their environmental impact
There are plans to require large businesses to disclose their environmental impact

The first year for which a report will be required is 2028

The business community has called for further refinement of the draft legislation on the Ukrainian quota market
The business community has called for further refinement of the draft legislation on the Ukrainian quota market

According to the business community, a separate fund should be established to manage the revenues from the NETS, and the priority for the use of these funds should be the decarbonisation of industry

Are the forests and coastline safe? Parliament has removed most of the controversial provisions from Bill No. 15122
Are the forests and coastline safe? Parliament has removed most of the controversial provisions from Bill No. 15122

However, the development still poses a threat to recreational land that has not been included in the exemptions