A canal instead of a river: eco-activists defended the preservation of rivers in Zhytomyr region from farmers' actions

A canal instead of a river: eco-activists defended the preservation of rivers in Zhytomyr region from farmers' actions polissyareg.dei.gov.ua

Maria Semenova

Agricultural enterprise destroyed rivers under the guise of land reclamation reform

Instead of a river stretch, there are dams made of construction debris. Taking advantage of water use reform, an agricultural enterprise in Zhytomyr Oblast attempted to transform the Tesnivka and Tnia rivers into a cascade of ponds.

According to the Ukrainian Nature Conservation Group (UNCG), the Supreme Court sided with environmental activists and the State Environmental Inspection.

Manipulation of water use reform

Land reclamation reform gives agricultural producers the right to create water user associations (WUA) and manage their own affairs – to invest in the reconstruction of land reclamation networks and make optimal use of water resources. However, in this particular case, the use of some legislative norms provoked violations of others.

The destruction of the river was presented as a success, according to the UNCG. Moreover, the USAID Agro project positioned the creation of the Lesini Dzherela WUA as a model to be implemented throughout the country.

The story of saving rivers

Back in 2024, UNCG environmental activists discovered only a semblance of a river at the site of the Tesnivka—a bare riverbed without trees on the banks, plowed meadows, and dams built from construction debris. The violation was confirmed by the State Environmental Inspection of the Polissya District, which was contacted by environmentalists.

The DEI called on the Adelaide Farm to comply with the law, but the farm decided to go further and challenge the environmental inspection's order in court. The farmers insisted that they did not need the EIA's conclusion because they had the right to water intake. At the same time, they refused to consider potato irrigation as land reclamation. The Pripyat River Basin Water Resources Group also supported the farmers' misinterpretation of the concepts. According to the UNCG, it deliberately decided to consider the river a reclamation canal.

These arguments convinced the court of first instance. So the farm confidently went even further — their ambitious dam construction spread to the Tnya River. Environmental activists discovered a "fresh" dam there in the summer of 2025. By blocking the riverbed, it raised the water intake level.

However, the rivers still received judicial "permission" to exist—on September 25 this year, the Fifth Administrative Court of Appeal ordered the farmers to comply with the State Environmental Inspection's order. And on October 29, this decision was upheld by the Supreme Court of Ukraine.

“This decision is important not only for the Tnya and Tesnivka rivers. It should set a precedent: even with substantial political connections, it is impossible to destroy rivers and view them solely as a water supply source for one’s enterprise,” the Ukrainian Nature Conservation Group emphasized.

Related
Illegal crossing results in a minimal fine: activists to challenge the police’s decision
Illegal crossing results in a minimal fine: activists to challenge the police’s decision

The structure was built to facilitate the movement of heavy machinery to the wind farm construction site in the mountains

The case concerning the National Military Cemetery in Markhaliv Forest is back before the Supreme Court
The case concerning the National Military Cemetery in Markhaliv Forest is back before the Supreme Court

Back at the start of the year, the authority ruled that the change in the designated use of the woodland for construction purposes was unlawful

Shooting animals in the nature reserve is illegal: activists have won their court case against the Khmelnytskyi Regional State Administration
Shooting animals in the nature reserve is illegal: activists have won their court case against the Khmelnytskyi Regional State Administration

The authorities did not even specify the types of animals, effectively allowing hunters to kill them at their own discretion

Communities in the Kharkiv region are refusing to allow environmentalists to establish protected areas
Communities in the Kharkiv region are refusing to allow environmentalists to establish protected areas

The Regional State Administration even went so far as to break the law by failing to provide either comments or approval of the applications