Verkhovna Rada to consider draft law No. 13174 on construction of infrastructure facilities

Verkhovna Rada to consider draft law No. 13174 on construction of infrastructure facilities shutterstock.com

Ілля Федунь

Environmental activists oppose the bill because of the possible development of wind farms in the Carpathians

At its meeting on Wednesday, October 8, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine will consider draft law No. 13174 “On the protection of land rights of owners of real estate destroyed as a result of hostilities.”

This was reported by the public organization “Golka.”

Bill No. 13174 has already passed its first reading and is being prepared for consideration in the second. Among other things, it provides for simplified obtaining of permits for the construction of infrastructure facilities, in particular in the Carpathians.

What the bill proposes

1) Protection of the rights of owners of land plots on which real estate objects were destroyed as a result of hostilities.

2) Transfer of state or communal land plots on which destroyed objects stood may be transferred to former owners without land auctions.

3) Free transfer of land plots during the period of martial law.

4) Transfer, lease, or change of the intended use of land plots during the period of martial law and for 5 years after its completion. This will be carried out without the mandatory development of urban planning documentation.

5) Preservation of the intended use of land plots that corresponded to the destroyed object.

However, according to the international public organization Green Peace, this bill will contribute to the mass construction of wind farms in the Carpathians.

According to representatives of the organization, if this amendment comes into force during the court hearings in the case of Polonyna Runa (Zakarpattia region), the developer would have every right to continue the environmental impact assessment (EIA) procedure. If the court's conclusion is positive, in particular, to continue destroying the highlands of the Carpathians.

Environmentalists noted that construction on Polonyna Runa, which is awaiting the conclusion of the environmental impact assessment procedure, will be resumed until the court case is completed. After all, it was suspended due to administrative proceedings.

Environmental activists added that the construction of foundations for wind turbines on Runa continues, primarily due to the position of the State Inspection of Architecture and Urban Planning of Ukraine and the State Environmental Inspection. In their opinion, the foundations of wind generators are separate structures that are not related to wind turbines and do not require an EIA.

“This amendment creates even more threats and gives free rein to unscrupulous developers,” Greenpeace said.

Greenpeace also stressed that not only Polonyna Runa, but also the entire Carpathian highlands could become silent victims of the adoption of the bill with such an amendment.

As EcoPolitics wrote in July, the Ukrainian parliament will consider bill No. 13174, one of the amendments to which is an attempt to circumvent the requirement to suspend the procedure for obtaining an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in the presence of legal proceedings.

Related
The battle for Odessa Zoo: whilst the animals suffer, people are vying for influence
The battle for Odessa Zoo: whilst the animals suffer, people are vying for influence

People are concerned about the welfare of the animals, as well as the allegations of corruption surrounding the organisation

The introduction of EPR could generate 16 billion UAH for waste treatment in Ukraine each year – an expert
The introduction of EPR could generate 16 billion UAH for waste treatment in Ukraine each year – an expert

Private investment in the sector will also create up to 80,000 jobs and bring billions in tax revenue into the formal economy

A breakthrough in hunting or the legalisation of killing: how Ukrainians are reacting to Bill No. 15431
A breakthrough in hunting or the legalisation of killing: how Ukrainians are reacting to Bill No. 15431

The bill’s main author describes it as a step towards a “model hunting culture”