The US government blocks funding for more than 200 environmental projects worth $7.6 billion

The US government blocks funding for more than 200 environmental projects worth $7.6 billion shutterstock.com

Illia Fedun

Most clean energy projects have been canceled in states that did not support Trump in the 2024 election

The administration of US President Donald Trump is blocking 321 grants to finance 223 environmental projects worth $7.6 billion that were aimed at renewable energy and the US energy system.

This was stated by US Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, C&EN reports.

Among the energy infrastructure projects that will be canceled:

1) renewable energy production;

2) hydrogen production;

3) grid modernization, carbon capture;

4) infrastructure for cars.

This step follows the US Department of Energy’s reduction of industrial decarbonization funding by $3.7 billion in early June. On October 7, an additional list of 600 projects set for cancellation by the Department of Energy was announced. In particular, the projects on the $7.6 billion list are part of an overall total of $20 billion. 

Chris Wright accuses the former leadership of the US Department of Energy of rushing to allocate funding in the last months of former US President Joe Biden’s administration. According to him, the allocation was carried out with inadequate documentation. The Secretary added that 26% of the cancelled grants were concluded between Election Day in 2024 and Inauguration Day in 2025. 

Experts added that the cancellation of funding mainly affects states that gave a minority of votes to President Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election. Only about seven of these relate to projects in states he won. The US Department of Energy notes that organizations have 30 days to appeal the decision regarding the funding of each project. 

“The demand for a number of innovative energy technologies is rising rapidly, and the US has simply become less competitive,” stated the US Clean Air Task Force Senior Director Conrad Schneider.

EcoPolitic readers will recall that after his inauguration, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement.

The newly elected president wanted to put an end to the leasing of land and water for wind energy and to cancel the actions of the administration of former US President Joe Biden, which promote the development of electric vehicles.

Also in February, the administration of US President Donald Trump canceled the allocation of $4 billion to the world's largest Green Climate Fund.

Additionally, in April, the US imposed new duties of up to 3521% on imports of solar panels from four Southeast Asian countries: Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Thailand.

Experts believe that the increased tariffs are a win for domestic producers, but at the same time strengthen the opposing forces that already threaten the development of renewable energy in the United States.

Finally, in March, the administration of US President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the UN Climate Change Fund.

At the 2023 climate conference, the United States promised to contribute $17.5 million to the fund, and the EU – $245 million, including $100 million from Germany. The decision was the latest step by the Trump administration to withdraw the United States from international agreements. The decision to withdraw from the UN fund was almost immediately condemned by the chairman of the African Negotiating Group, Ali Mohamed.

Related
The European Commission has issued recommendations to Ukraine regarding amendments to the draft law on the national public service broadcaster
The European Commission has issued recommendations to Ukraine regarding amendments to the draft law on the national public service broadcaster

The system must be as closely aligned with the European one as possible in order to avoid disruption when they are actually merged in the third phase

Ukrainians are paying the price for the ‘rubbish’ reform that local authorities have ignored – expert
Ukrainians are paying the price for the ‘rubbish’ reform that local authorities have ignored – expert

Virtually all towns and cities in Ukraine have failed to update their waste management model and are therefore, in effect, in breach of current legislation

Litter in the forest? Pay 51,000 UAH: penalties may increase for
Litter in the forest? Pay 51,000 UAH: penalties may increase for

If officials fail to take steps to eliminate illegal dumps, they will also be fined

Decarbonisation without deindustrialisation: EBA proposals for the draft bill on the National System of Trade in Emissions
Decarbonisation without deindustrialisation: EBA proposals for the draft bill on the National System of Trade in Emissions

The third phase of the ETS could undermine the economic viability of a business unless eco-modernisation is carried out in advance