The Environmental Protection Committee held a meeting. What were the results?

The Environmental Protection Committee held a meeting. What were the results? shutterstock

Maria Semenova

Both draft laws are recommended for consideration by the Verkhovna Rada

Members of the Committee on Environmental Policy and Nature Management reviewed draft laws on flood risk management and regulation of the biocides market. The documents concern not only safety, but also the approximation of Ukrainian legislation to European standards.

This is stated in a report by the eco-committee.

Civil protection and flood control

The main focus was on draft law No. 13418. It aims to amend certain legislative acts relating to flood risk management. The amendments are also intended to ensure Ukraine's participation in the European Union's Civil Protection Mechanism.

The document has been prepared for its second reading. A total of 1,107 proposals and amendments were submitted. The committee decided to submit the final version of the bill, drafted by MPs Oleg Bondarenko and Anzhelika Labunska, to the Verkhovna Rada and recommend its adoption in its entirety in the second reading.

Regulation of the biocide market

The second draft law reviewed by the environmental committee concerns the placing on the market and use of biocidal products (No. 13604). Its purpose is to implement European Regulation No. 528/2012 of 22.05.2012 and to establish a modern regulatory system in Ukraine for placing on the market and use of biocidal products.

The draft law aims to simultaneously protect people, animals, and the environment from the negative impact of biocides as well as from the harmful organisms targeted by these substances. This was stated at the meeting by Mykhailo Radutskyi, Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee on National Health, Medical Assistance, and Health Insurance, who presented the new document.

Members of the environmental committee decided to recommend that the Verkhovna Rada adopt draft law No. 13604 as a basis, taking the remarks into account.

Additional issues

The environmental committee approved the tentative meeting schedule for January. The next meeting is planned for January 28.

Committee members were presented with information about the progress of legislative work in 2025, and they also approved proposals on environmental issues for inclusion in the draft agenda of the next parliamentary session.

As previously reported by EkoPolitic, at the previous meeting the environmental committee reviewed draft laws concerning the improvement of subsoil use and the status of mountain settlements.

Parliamentarians also submitted proposals for a joint decision based on the results of the offsite meeting in Zakarpattia, where compliance with legislation during the construction of wind power plants in the mountains was discussed.

Related
Ukraine is simplifying logging regulations to increase timber harvests — Ministry of Economy
Ukraine is simplifying logging regulations to increase timber harvests — Ministry of Economy

The review concerns the approval of sanitary felling and the simplification of the process for issuing felling permits

“As soon as we recognise that an animal is not an object but a living being with feelings, everything will fall into place,” — Yaroslava Koba
“As soon as we recognise that an animal is not an object but a living being with feelings, everything will fall into place,” — Yaroslava Koba

The war has changed not only people, but also their attitude towards those who cannot defend themselves

The Verkhovna Rada has finally published the text of Bill No. 15386 on the establishment of the ETS
The Verkhovna Rada has finally published the text of Bill No. 15386 on the establishment of the ETS

The document has already been submitted to the environmental committee for consideration without any consultation with stakeholders

The draft bill on the ETS is being pushed through without any debate or public disclosure of the document itself
The draft bill on the ETS is being pushed through without any debate or public disclosure of the document itself

Industry experts provided a great many comments on the previous version, but it is not known whether these were taken into account