Ecotax — latest ecology news

One community doesn't even have an environmental protection program. Although its urban improvement program is not much different from "environmental" ones

The top spot in terms of revenue goes not to a region, but to a city

In the capital’s environmental well-being program, only one section is devoted to environmental protection measures

In an effort to "improve air quality," the city of Bila Tserkva has decided to build a bypass road at a cost of over 50 million hryvnias

In Ternopil, restoring lawns after the removal of small architectural forms is a matter of environmental protection, not urban beautification

For some reason, protecting the facades of historic buildings in Lviv from birds is considered an environmental protection measure

This is the most vague list of measures, though it still makes clear how the environmental tax is being spent on sewer systems and landscaping in residential areas

Measures to reduce emissions include replacing public transport and purchasing street vacuum cleaners

Without conceptual reform, any changes to the size of the eco-tax will have no impact on the state of the environment or the quality of our lives

Communities have a certain degree of freedom both in developing environmental programs and in using funds from the special environmental tax fund

The extractive industry, particularly the oil and gas and metallurgical industries, remains the leader in resource payments

In Chornomorsk, even the construction of dog walking areas is considered an environmental measure